Conditioned to Associate Sexual Stimulation with a Physical Attack

Thu, 01/10/2013 - 13:41
Submitted by Betty Dodson

I've had an ongoing email exchange with a young man who lived in Russia where he studied medicine. He is now a doctor but doesn't practice.

He has been restoring his foreskin and the last time I saw him, he appeared to be intact. Doc R lives out of a suitcase and travels extensively. He just spent time in China but is now back in the USA living on a farm:

"Something’s “snapped” in me, I just don’t have a “connection” to “people here in neo-America. On the farm, I’m surrounded by trees. In America, I’m surrounded by sheeple (formerly known as “people”), except for yourself and a few others. They don’t know they’re alive. They can’t rile me, can’t anger me, any more than trees do. I’m not Catholic, so I can’t tell this to a priest. Sorry to dump it on you?

In medical school, I had physiology, probably told you about this? We studied Pavlov’s dogs, classical conditioning. The dogs associated a bell with food, and salivated. I “connected the dots”. If you look closely, and understand surgery with circumcision, the butcher palpates the baby’s penis, tries to get it semi-erect, like an erect nipple if you gently rub it. That’s sexual stimulation. Pleasant, “welcome”, the baby’s first sexual stimulation, probably the first significant physical pleasure.

Then the butcher crimps the foreskin with foreceps – if you’ve ever been pinched with needle-nosed pliars you’ll appreciate the level of pain? Then he puts on the clamp. The ordeal lasts 15 to 20 minutes of sheer agony, hell if it could ever exist. So painful that measurements were off-the-scale (you can read about it in pain studies). The baby is Pavlovian conditioned to associate sexual stimulation with a physical attack of the most excruciating kind.

Sexual stimulation is a prelude to agony. We’re not talking about a spanking, or an exciting paddling you would get from a BDSM dominatrix. This isn’t play. It’s hell. Did I tell you about the “freeze” response? There’s “fight-or-flight”, and the lesser-known “freeze” response, have you heard about this? If you look at wikipedia’s list of serial killers by country, they had to put modern America on a separate list from the other countries. Those women, at least some of them, are secondary victims of circumcision.

In the Second World War, you probably heard about the “Russians” raping German and allied women? They weren’t Russians. I know Russians, bad as I talk about them, they’re not rapos. Moscow has something like 9 rapes a week, it’s bizarre. Russian men don’t think of rape as “macho”, at least they have that part right. The rapes were basically circumcised Muslim troops of the Soviet Union – Uzbek, Kirgiz, Turkmen, etc.

When the notion that the initial stimulation of circumcision – the pre-surgical work up (swabbing the penis with a cool antiseptic for example; try it on a nipple or your clitoris! It’s quite pleasant), then the 20 minutes of hell and neuro-genic shock (the babies don’t “go to sleep”, they go into unresponsive shock from the level of agony), I was catatonic for a week. Now I’m “cleaning up” the whole theory – learning about sexual abuse and its effects on the victim.

It’s eerie. America, a nation where a male sexual abuse survivor is basically the norm. A sexual abuse survivor nation. Or, rather, victim. A “survivor” has been through therapy, a victim is still suffering the effects.

American men are clueless. America is clueless. And too wrapped up in their “macho-dumbness” to realize, or be able to realize, that they’re victims of profound sexual abuse, that they have “issues” and “complexes” on steroids. Think about it? The ‘60’s generation “gap” was the start. Those “hippies” were victims of circumcision, they were profoundly “different”, it wasn’t a social revolution, it was a sexual ABUSE revolution. The ‘60’s was the first generation of sexual abuse victims in America. “Let the sun shine” as the song goes. Does this make sense?"

My answer is "YES indeed! It makes all the sense in this brutal world of ours.

Liberating women one orgasm at a time

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Clarification please

Fri, 01/11/2013 - 06:33

I'm confused. Is he saying rapists rape and serial killers murder because they are circumcised?

RE: Clarification please

Fri, 01/11/2013 - 21:26

Mele, as I understand the post above, I believe he is saying that
there is a direct statistical correlation with Male Genital Mutilation
(circumcision) and violence, specifically sexual violence, violence
against women, and muder, all of which are found in extremely high rates
for the United States (Especially considering it falls under the
catgory of an "Industrialized Nation"). Some of the countries considered
to be the worst for a woman to live in, in regards to equality and
violence against women, also have some of the highest rates of
circumcision (http://www.circumcision.org/harmswomen.htm).
(Of course, not being the author of this post I cannot say for certain this
is what he means by this, but this is my understanding and I hope it
helps.)

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.